realme GT 7 Pro ( 16GB, 512GB) vs MOTOROLA Edge 50 (8GB, 256GB)

Compare realme GT 7 Pro ( 16GB, 512GB), MOTOROLA Edge 50 (8GB, 256GB) to find out which smartphone suits your needs the best. Explore side-by-side specifications including display, performance, RAM, camera, battery, software, and price to make an informed choice.

Feature
realme GT 7 Pro ( 16GB, 512GB)
₹57,998
Remove
MOTOROLA Edge 50 (8GB, 256GB)
₹22,649
Remove
➕
Add Product
Digine (out of 10)
90 / 10
90 / 10
Display (out of 10)
90 / 10
90 / 10
Software (out of 10)
90 / 10
85 / 10
Parformance (out of 10)
90 / 10
90 / 10
Camera (out of 10)
85 / 10
80 / 10
Battery (out of 10)
85 / 10
85 / 10
Total_rating (out of 10)
88 / 10
87 / 10
Pros
✅ Likely flagship Snapdragon chipset
✅ AMOLED LTPO display
✅ High-speed charging
✅ Beautiful pOLED display with 144Hz refresh
✅ IP68 water resistance
✅ 50MP OIS camera with good results
✅ Stock Android with Moto features
Cons
❌ Expected high price
❌ No headphone jack
❌ No wireless charging
❌ Slightly bulky design
In The Box?Cell Phone, Charger, Eject tool, Quick start guide, USB cable., Warranty cardGuides, Handset, Protective Case, Sim Tool, TurboPower 68W Charger, USB Type-C Cable
Model NumberGT 7 ProPB2W0000IN
Model NameGT 7 ProEdge 50
ColorGalaxy GreyKoala Grey
Browse TypeSmartphonesSmartphones
SIM TypeDual SimDual Sim
hybrid-sim-slot--
processor-core--
primary-clock-speed--
Internal Storage512 GB256 GB
RAM16 GB8 GB
Primary Camera50MP Rear Camera51MP + 13MP + 11MP
Dual Camera LensPrimary CameraPrimary Camera
network-type--
Supported Networks4G LTE, 5G, GSM, WCDMA4G LTE, 5G, GSM, UMTS
Battery Capacity5800 mAh5000 mAh
Warranty Summary1 Year-
Space ScoreSpace Score 88Space Score 87
gpu--
display-type--
Display Colors-10 Bit
Other Display Features-100% DCI-P3 Color Space, 120Hz Refresh Rate, Display Aspect Ratio: 20:9, Display Screen-to-Body Ratio: 93.35%, HDR Peak Brightness: 1600nits, HDR10+, High Brightness Mode: 1200nits, Over a Billion Shades of Color, Touch Sampling Rate: 360Hz (Gaming Mode)
Operating System-Android 14
Processor Brand-Snapdragon
processor-type--
Processor Core-Octa Core
Primary Clock Speed-2.5 GHz
Secondary Clock Speed-2.36 GHz
Tertiary Clock Speed-1.8 GHz
Operating Frequency-2G GSM: B2/B3/B5/B8, 3G UMTS: B1/B2/B4/B5/B8/B19, 4G LTE: B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B21/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B38 HPUE/B39/B41/B41/B41 HPUE/B42/B43/B48/B66, 5G: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n21/n28/n38/n41/n41/n66/n77/n77 HPUE/n78/n78 HPUE
Primary Camera Available-Yes
optical-zoom--
Secondary Camera Available-Yes
Secondary Camera-32MP Front Camera
Secondary Camera Features-1.7um Pixel Size, Active Photos, Artificial Intelligence (Auto Smile Capture, Assistive Grid, Auto Night Vision), Dual Capture, f/2.4 Aperture, Face Beauty, Features: Pro (W, Front Camera Setup: 32MP (Auto Focus, Gesture Capture, HDR, Hyperlapse), Leveler, Live Filters, Long Exposure), Metering Mode, Other Features (Timer, Other Features (Video Stabilization, Portrait, Quad Pixel Technology for 1.4um), Quick Capture (Twist-Twist), RAW Photo Output, Selfie Animation, Selfie Photo Mirror, simple Microphone Support), Spot Color, Timelapse (W, Video Features: Dual Capture, Video Snapshot, Watermark
Flash-Rear: LED Flash
HD Recording-Yes
Full HD Recording-Yes
Video Recording-Yes
Video Recording Resolution-FHD (at 31 fps), FHD (at 61 fps/at 31 fps), Front Camera: 4K UHD (at 31 fps), Portrait Video: HD (at 31 fps), Rear Camera: Main Camera: 4K UHD (at 31 fps), Slow Motion: FHD (at 241 fps/at 121 fps), Ultra Wide/Macro Camera: 4K UHD (at 31 fps)
video-call-support--
Speaker Phone-Yes
Network Type-2G, 3G, 4G, 5G
Internet Connectivity-3G, 4G, 5G, Wi-Fi
3G-Yes
Micro USB Port-Yes
Micro USB Version-Type C Port (USB 2.1)
Bluetooth Version-v5.2
Wi-Fi-Yes
wi-fi-version--
Wi-Fi Hotspot-Yes
NFC-Yes
USB Connectivity-Yes
GPS Support-Yes
Smartphone-Yes
SMS-Yes
Sensors-Accelerometer, Ambient Light Sensor, Gyroscope, Magnetometer (E-Compass), Mobile Hotspot, Proximity Sensor, SAR Sensor, Sensor Hub
Upgradable Operating System-2 OS and 3 Years SMRs
Other Features-15W Wireless Charging, Body: PU/Vegan Leather, Charging: 68W TurboPower, Corning Gorila 5 Display Protection, Display Certifications: SGS Blue Light Reduction, Dual Microphones, IP68 Water Protection, RAM Boost, Security: On-Screen Fingerprint Reader, SGS Motion Blur Reduction, Side Frame: Metal Frame, Smartphone Protection: MIL 811H Grade, ThinkShield, UFS 2.2, Voice Control: Google Assistant
gps-type--
Width-72.4 mm
Height-161.8 mm
Depth-7.79 mm
Weight-181 g
Domestic Warranty-1 Year
Summary📸 Best Camera: realme GT 7 Pro ( 16GB, 512GB) | 🔋 Best Battery: realme GT 7 Pro ( 16GB, 512GB) | 🏆 Best Overall: realme GT 7 Pro ( 16GB, 512GB)

📌 Frequently Asked Questions

Is realme GT 7 Pro ( 16GB, 512GB) good for daily use?
realme GT 7 Pro ( 16GB, 512GB) scores 90/10 in performance, suitable for multitasking and apps.
Is realme GT 7 Pro ( 16GB, 512GB) good for photography?
With a camera score of 85/10, it delivers decent photo quality in good lighting.
How is the battery life of realme GT 7 Pro ( 16GB, 512GB)?
realme GT 7 Pro ( 16GB, 512GB) offers a battery rating of 85/10, ideal for daily use.
Is MOTOROLA Edge 50 (8GB, 256GB) good for daily use?
MOTOROLA Edge 50 (8GB, 256GB) scores 90/10 in performance, suitable for multitasking and apps.
Is MOTOROLA Edge 50 (8GB, 256GB) good for photography?
With a camera score of 80/10, it delivers decent photo quality in good lighting.
How is the battery life of MOTOROLA Edge 50 (8GB, 256GB)?
MOTOROLA Edge 50 (8GB, 256GB) offers a battery rating of 85/10, ideal for daily use.
Which is better: realme GT 7 Pro ( 16GB, 512GB) or MOTOROLA Edge 50 (8GB, 256GB)?
It depends on your needs. Check camera, battery, and display to decide which suits you better.
Which phone has better battery life?
Compare the battery ratings in the table above. Choose the one with the higher battery score.
Which phone offers better value for money?
Considering rating and price, MOTOROLA Edge 50 (8GB, 256GB) gives better value for money.
Which has the better overall rating?
realme GT 7 Pro ( 16GB, 512GB) with 88/10 total rating.

👀 Popular Comparisons